Sleep Apnea Oral Appliance Vs Cpap

Convenience cpap machines although considered very effective have a reputation for being inconvenient.

Sleep apnea oral appliance vs cpap.

The device is small and fits right in your luggage. If you believe that you have sleep apnea visit a qualified medical professional who can assess your condition. The sleep apnea oral appliance resembles a mouthguard. It simply moves your lower jaw forward to keep your.

Recommended by the american academy of sleep medicine oral devices also called oral appliances can be used for the treatment of mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea osa. If you have mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea and can t tolerate or haven t been helped by cpap oral appliances may be an effective treatment option. However while extremely effective the cpap does not work for everyone. Continuous positive airway pressure therapy is the most commonly recommended treatment for sleep apnea.

The cpap machine was once the gold standard for treating sleep apnea but now the oral appliance is the go to method for those with obstructive sleep apnea. Unlike cpap an oral appliance does not make any noise. It looks similar to the mouthguard you d wear while playing sports. When a patient does not take well to the cpap a dentist who specializes in sleep therapy may recommend an oral appliance.

Cpap machine vs oral appliance. Oral appliances or dental devices in use by sleep medicine dentists for years are now fda approved as a first line treatment for mild moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Oral appliance therapy has emerged as an important alternative to continuous positive airway pressure cpap in treating patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome osas. Meaning that your spouse or partner will be able to get a restful night s sleep.

Health insurance will usually cover costs associated with an oral sleep apnea device. An oral appliance is a less cumbersome alternative to cpap. Travel with an oral appliance is easy. The question of which treatment may be better for someone with sleep apnea depends on a number of factors one of the greatest being their compliance with the treatment.

In the past physicians would only recommend these apnea mouthpieces as an alternative or secondary treatment for patients who could not tolerate cpap therapy and they are. In this study we report about the subjective and objective treatment outcome of oral appliance therapy and cpap in patients with osas. Here are the main differences between the oral appliance and the cpap machine.